Zyte vs Oxylabs
Oxylabs gives you infrastructure.Zyte gives you the data.
Oxylabs is proxy-centric: proxies, Web Unblocker, Web Scraper API and Headless Browser as separate products. You decide how they fit together and keep them working. Zyte API handles everything, all-in-one.
ISO 27001 certifiedMember of the Ethical Web Data Collection Initiative (EWDCI)
Independent benchmark
Zyte vs Oxylabs: success rate, speed + throughput
Proxyway, an independent reviewer, tested 11 web scraping APIs, including Oxylabs, against 15 heavily protected websites. Zyte API recorded the highest success rate and the highest throughput of any API tested, and was ranked the best overall web scraping API heading into 2026.
Success rate
Zyte 93.14% vs. Oxylabs 85.82%
Speed
Zyte 11.15s · Oxylabs 16.76s
Throughput
Zyte 15,422 vs. Oxylabs 10,174
Three differences
Why teams move from Oxylabs to Zyte.
One API instead of a modular stack. Billing tied to successful responses. Structured data, not just unblocked pages.
One request, not a stack
Access, unblocking, proxy rotation, rendering, sessions, retries and extraction happen inside one request. Oxylabs splits these across proxy products, Web Unblocker, Headless Browser and Web Scraper API. Each has its own integration, docs and payment plan.
You only pay for responses that worked
Failed attempts cost you nothing. Oxylabs pricing varies by product and may include proxy, bandwidth, scraper or browser models, so cost accrues across several meters rather than tracking the data you actually used.
Structured data, not just unblocked HTML
Products, articles, job postings, forum threads and SERP results come back as typed fields, with custom attributes when you need them. Oxylabs routes structured output through Web Scraper API, prebuilt scraper targets, datasets and AI Studio — fast when a packaged target fits, another product to adopt when it doesn't.
Side by side
How Zyte and Oxylabs compare
| Dimension | Zyte | Oxylabs |
|---|---|---|
| Product model: What you buy, and how many pieces you assemble. | One API covering simple, moderate and difficult sites. | A modular catalogue across proxy infrastructure, Web Unblocker, Web Scraper API, Headless Browser, datasets and AI tools. |
| Access: Reaching a page successfully when a site resists automated traffic. | Applies the leanest working strategy by default and escalates only when a site requires it. | Strong proxy infrastructure and Web Unblocker, but you often decide how proxies, unblocker, browser, sessions and retries fit together. |
| Browser rendering: Running a real browser for JavaScript-heavy pages and on-page actions. | Point existing Playwright or Puppeteer scripts at Zyte-hosted browsers with Browser CDP, with anti-blocking and stealth built in. Or run rendering, actions, screenshots, cookies and sessions inside a single API request. | A separate Headless Browser product for teams that want remote Playwright or Puppeteer-style browser infrastructure. |
| Structured extraction: Turning a fetched page into typed fields you can use directly. | Returns products, product lists, articles, article lists, forum threads, job postings, search results, page content and custom attributes. | Web Scraper API, prebuilt scraper targets, datasets and AI Studio tools for building extraction workflows. |
| Pricing: What you are billed for, and what a failed attempt costs. | Success-based pricing, so spend maps to successful responses. | Pricing varies by product and may include proxy, bandwidth, scraper, browser or other product-specific models. |
| Maintenance: Who absorbs the work as sites change and break. | Takes on the work of maintaining access, rendering, retries and extraction as sites change. | More infrastructure flexibility, which can mean more configuration, integration, monitoring and cost optimisation on your side. |
| Independent benchmark: Proxyway's head-to-head test, Dec 2025. | 93.14% success · 11.15s average response · 15,422 results per hour. | 85.82% success · 16.76s average response · 10,174 results per hour. |
Reviews
Don't take our word for it
We set everything up once, and it continued to work for years without a hitch.
Where each one wins
Which one fits your team
Choose Zyte when
- You collect web data across many sites, not one
- Your targets include protected, JavaScript-heavy or frequently changing sites
- Your team spends real time on proxy selection, retries, rendering and ban recovery
- You need structured data, not just retrieved HTML
- You want spend tied to successful results and predictable cost per usable record
- You want engineering control without owning every infrastructure decision
- You want to avoid paying a premium for automation only on the hardest parts of the stack
Choose Oxylabs when
- You want to buy and manage raw proxy infrastructure
- You need deep proxy-type, geo, ASN or network-level control
- Your main need is standalone remote browser infrastructure
- You want a prebuilt scraper, dataset or AI Studio workflow that already matches your source and schema
- Your team wants to assemble and operate a modular web data stack
- Your use case depends on a broad proxy catalogue more than an integrated operating model
Two ways to work with Zyte
Run it yourself, or have us run it.
Same collection engine underneath. The difference is how much of the operating work sits with your team.
All-in-one web scraping API
Zyte API
You build and run the pipeline. One API handles access, rendering, sessions, retries and extraction; you keep the crawling logic, scheduling and orchestration.
Start with Zyte APIManaged data services
Zyte Data
We build and run it for you. You specify the sources, fields and delivery schedule; data arrives on time, to spec, with the maintenance handled.
Explore Zyte DataEither way, Zyte helps teams maintain the data, not the plumbing.
FAQ














